“Investigate what is, and not what pleases”.
|goethe quotes tree of knowledge – Google Search|
|Michael Novakhov – 6:16 AM 8/8/2018
A number of criteria, and among them: internal, “construct” consistency and validity, its “internal logic’. Investigative hypothesis is valid in the same way any other cognitive, including the scientific, hypothesis is valid. The various hypotheses compete with each other for the “validation” and acceptance as the legitimate new paradigms, just like the branches of the tree compete with each other for the supplies of nutrients from its roots in their quest for the growth and development.
This concept was addressed in “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” By Thomas S. Kuhn and in “Conjectures and Refutations” By Karl Popper.
All valid investigative hypotheses must be investigated to the fullest.
The “German Hypothesis” is the valid investigative hypothesis, in my humble opinion. If someone thinks otherwise, please come forward and prove your point.
As the valid investigative hypothesis, the “German Hypothesis”, as I call it, naming the main and the leading player, should be investigated to the fullest and to the utmost depth.
Not investigating it would be the investigatory negligence, it seems to me.
Mr. Mueller, please investigate the “German Hypothesis” of the Operations “Trump” and “9/11” in depth and in details; and if you do not investigate it, please explain to the people, why you do not investigate it.