Message (by Noviy Choke) in a bottle | Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – 8:11 PM 10/1/2018 |
Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:45:44 +0200
Message (by Noviy Choke) in a bottle | Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – 8:11 PM 10/1/2018
|
M.N.: The Boshirov-Chepiga – Dyumin connection (as implied leaders in the operation of rescuing Yanukovych) might have some “low flying” homophobic undercurrents and political purposes: to revive the rumors about the gay relationship between Putin and Dyumin, his former bodyguard. The similarity with the homophobic attacks on Macron are obvious.
___________________________________
M.N.: This is the direct threat from the Demiurge: the substance, “Novichok” or any other, could be used easily, against anyone and at any time. This episode also looks like a device to draw the attention to the issues of Chemical Weapons which always were of the special interest to the Germans, with the New Abwehr retaining or obtaining some supplies.
Novichok agent – Wikipedia – 5:49 AM 10/2/2018: M.N.: The broad range of actors, from the German Intelligence (and the New Abwehr) to Chechens (or, very likely, the Chechens under the German Intelligence), could be in possession of some amounts of “Novichok” and they can be viewed as the potential suspects as organisers and masterminds of the Salisbury and Amesbury Poisoning episodes..October 2, 2018
novichok – Google Search | ||
|
chemical weapons – Google Search | ||
|
Porton Down – Wikipedia:
“In 1970, the senior establishment at Porton Down was renamed the Chemical Defence Establishment (CDE) for the next 21 years. Preoccupation with defence against nerve agents continued, but in the 1970s and 1980s, the Establishment was also concerned with studying reported chemical warfare by Iraq against Iran and against its own Kurdishpopulation.[5]
Porton Down was the laboratory where initial samples of the Ebola virus were sent in 1976 during the first confirmed outbreak of the disease in Africa. The laboratory now contains samples of some of the world’s most aggressive pathogens, including Ebola, anthrax and the plague, and is leading the UK’s current research into viral inoculations.[6]“
________________________________
The Scarface
Mike Nova’s Shared NewsLinks![]() |
||
---|---|---|
otto skorzeny – Google Search | ||
|
This historical analogy with Otto Skorzeny is striking and most likely, it contains the main clue to those events: the New Abwehr was behind the “Operation Yanukovych” from the beginning to the end. They lifted him with the help of the Manafort’s Jaws, just like a seagull lifts a crab on a beach, only to drop it from the highest highs, in order to break its hard bony shell, and to consume the fresh and delicious crab meat salad for lunch. That’s the Abwehr’s style.
This must explain, at least in part, the recently reported violent encounter between the two men, Putin and Yanukovich who apparently blamed his loss on Putin and, possibly on the Germans.
So, everything: from the Putin’s poisoning by Dioxin, described, as the hypothesis, earlier in my blogs, to the Yanukovich’s elections, to prosecution of Timoshenko, to snipers on Kiyev rooftops, to panicky escape to Crimea, was, it looks like, designed and managed by the Demiurge in his (unlikely “her”) psycho-historical reality show screenplay.
Michael Novakhov
10.2.18
________________________
_______________________________
По данным журналиста, именно за эту спецоперацию Чепигу наградили званием Героя России. Канев добавил, что за эвакуацию Януковича звание Героя России получил
- бывший охранник президента Владимира Путина Алексей Дюмин, а также люди, составившие
- «костяк» «ЧВК Вагнера».
“The Wagner Group
itself first showed up in 2014,[1] along with Utkin in the Luhansk region of Ukraine.[25] The company’s name comes from Utkin’s own call sign (“Wagner”), which
he allegedly chose due to a passion for the Third Reich.[27]
Radio Liberty cited insiders as saying that the Slavic Native Faith (a modern Pagan cult) is a faith favored by the leadership of the Wagner Group.[28] In August 2017, the Turkish Yeni Şafak speculated that Utkin was possibly just a figurehead for the company, while the real head of Wagner was someone else”.[29]
Wagner Group – Wikipedia
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr?
Mike Nova’s Shared NewsLinks![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
СМИ узнали, за что “Боширов”-Чепига получил звание героя России в 2014 | Новости | ||||
СМИ узнали, за что “Боширов”-Чепига получил звание героя России в 2014 |
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
Is Wagner Group a part of the New Abwehr? – Google Search | ||||
Milton Kramer, 99, a Third-Generation Pillar of Chabad in America<a href=”http://Chabad.org” rel=”nofollow”>Chabad.org</a>–Sep 3, 2018
The Tzemach Tzedek synagogue on the Lower East Side, of which Morris served … according to his GPU file, “being the leader of a Jewish nationalist group of Hasids, … William Borah, Royal Coperland and Robert Wagner. … Milton grew up in Brooklyn attending New York’s fledgling Jewish day schools, …
Kovac setzt auf Bubi-Abwehr, Müller trifft doppeltt-online.de–Aug 15, 2018
Die Tore für den deutschen Rekordmeister erzielten Sandro Wagner (30./41.) und Thomas Müller (73./86.). Dabei war der HSV durch seinen …
Bundestrainer Löw kritisiert Wagner scharft-online.de–May 19, 2018
Mit harten Worten hat Sandro Wagner seinen Rücktritt aus dem DFB-Team verkündet, griff auch den Bundestrainer an. Löw haut die Kritik jetzt …
Löws Bauchgefühl contra Wagner und GötzeSüddeutsche.de–May 15, 2018
Joachim Löw erstaunt bei der Nominierung seines vorläufigen WM-Kaders die Beobachter. Der Bundestrainer beruft Nils Petersen ins …
Petersen statt Wagner im vorläufigen WM-Kader – Löw und Bierhoff …
International–Handelsblatt–May 15, 2018 |
||||
Wagner Group – Wikipedia | ||||
History, organization, status[edit]The founder of the company is reported to be Dmitriy Valeryevich Utkin, who was born in Kirovohrad Oblast (then the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic of the USSR) in 1970.[22][23][24] According to the Security Service of Ukraine′s statement in September 2017, Dmitriy Utkin used to be a Ukrainian citizen.[23] Up until 2013, he was a lieutenant colonel and brigade commander of a special forces (Spetsnaz GRU) unit (the 700th Independent Spetsnaz Detachment of the 2nd Independent Brigade) of Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU).[25][1][26] He retired in 2013 and began working for the private company Moran Security Group founded by Russian military veterans; the company performed security and training missions around the world, specializing in security against piracy. The same year, senior Moran Security Group managers were involved in setting up a Saint Petersburg-based organization Slavonic Corps that headhunted contractors to “protect oil fields and pipelines” in Syria.[1] Utkin was in Syria as part of the Slavonic Corps and survived its disastrous mission.[25] The Wagner Group itself first showed up in 2014,[1] along with Utkin in the Luhansk region of Ukraine.[25] The company’s name comes from Utkin’s own call sign (“Wagner”), which he allegedly chose due to a passion for the Third Reich.[27]Radio Liberty cited insiders as saying that the Slavic Native Faith (a modern Pagan cult) is a faith favored by the leadership of the Wagner Group.[28] In August 2017, the Turkish Yeni Şafak speculated that Utkin was possibly just a figurehead for the company, while the real head of Wagner was someone else.[29] |
||||
Шендерович нашел объяснение тому, почему ФСБ решила защитить личную жизнь неразлучных «офицеров ГРУ» – Лидеры мнений | ||||
26/09/2018
Блогеры позже активно обсуждали эту их недоговоренность, а кто-то предполагал, что гейская тема была специально придумана, чтобы их визит в Солсбери выглядел в глазах общественности «несерьезным». |
||||
Journalist says Skripal suspect helped Yanukovych to flee Ukraine – 2:54 PM 10/1/2018 | Russia News | ||||
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||
Базы данных: откуда информация о полковнике ГРУ Чепиге | Россия и россияне: взгляд из Европы | DW | ||||
“Мы не собираемся участвовать в спекуляциях по поводу их настоящих имен”, – ответили в Скотленд-Ярде на просьбу DW прокомментировать совместное расследование Bellingcat и The Insider о подозреваемых в отравлении бывшего двойного агента Сергея Скрипаля и его дочери Юлии 4 марта 2018 года в Солсбери. Журналисты-расследователи утверждают, что идентифицировали одного из подозреваемых: его имя не Руслан Боширов, а Анатолий Чепига, и он – полковник ГРУ.
Министр обороны Великобритании Гэвин Уильямсон сначала подтвердил выводы расследования, но затем стер собственное сообщение в Twitter. Тем не менее британская полиция выразила уверенность, что считает “Боширова” и “Петрова” псевдонимами, а источники агентства Reuters по вопросам безопасности, близкие к расследованию, подтвердили верность выводов The Insider и Bellingcat, добавив, что настоящие имена подозреваемых уже известны следователям в Лондоне. Российской газете “Коммерсант” удалось связаться с жителями села Березовка в Амурской области, в которой долгое время жила семья Чепиг. Знакомые, попросившие не называть их, однозначно опознали “Руслана Боширова” именно как Анатолия Чепигу. “База ФМС” и другая “дополнительная информация” Как энтузиастам-расследователям из частного проекта и российским журналистам удалось выйти на след двух офицеров ГРУ? “У нас не было ожиданий, что мы сможем установить их паспортные данные”, – сказал газете The Guardian руководитель Bellingcat Элиот Хиггинс. Однако, по его словам, к ним “стали обращаться люди” с “дополнительной информацией”, и “некоторые данные были очень узкоспециализированными”. Главным источником сведений об обоих подозреваемых, судя по описанию в самом расследовании, стали российские государственные базы данных разных типов. Причастность “Руслана Боширова” (Чепиги) и Александра Петрова к спецслужбам Bellingcat и The Insider установили, по их утверждению, благодаря “базе ФМС” (Федеральная миграционная служба РФ. – Ред.). Возможность, которую в российском МВД отрицают: по базе данных ФМС невозможно определить, является ли человек сотрудником ГРУ или любого другого ведомства, так прокомментировал расследование замглавы МВД РФ Игорь Зубов в интервью российскому агентству “Интерфакс”. “Известно, что на рынке полно баз данных ГИБДД, связанных с автомобилями, с ЖКХ и с банками. Они есть, они продаются на “Горбушке” (рынок в Москве. – Ред.), ими пользуются журналисты – совершенно точно, в том числе, что самое потрясающее, государственных СМИ”, – утверждает Плющев. Вместе с тем он предположил, что расследователи могли найти человека, который в сети даркнет (анонимная часть интернета с децентрализованной системой связи и шифрованием. – Ред.) “за деньги может анонимно делать выписки из настоящей, актуальной базы данных паспортов, с фотографиями”.
Now live
01:50 мин
“2:0 в пользу Лондона” – немецкие СМИ об интервью Петрова и Боширова |
||||
Чепига получил звание Героя России за эвакуацию Януковича | ||||
Подозреваемый британской полицией в отравлении Скрипалей Руслан Боширов, он же, по некоторым данным, офицер ГРУ России Анатолий Чепига, возглавлял операцию по эвакуации из Киева президента Украины Виктора Януковича. Об этом в эфире украинского телеканала “Громадське” сообщил российский журналист Сергей Канев, принимавший участие в расследовании The Insider и Bellingcat, благодаря которому в деле и появилась фамилия Чепиги.
Канев рассказал, что Чепига с подразделением спецназа прибыл в резиденцию Януковича “Межигорье” в феврале 2014 года, “находился там” и “охранял его”. По информации журналиста, за операцию по вывозу Януковича из Украины Чепига получил звание героя России. Канев также утверждает, что за эту же операцию то же звание получил бывший охранник Владимира Путина, а ныне губернатор Тульской области Алексей Дюмин. “Мне также известно, что награды получили люди, которые в дальнейшем составили костяк “частной военной компании Вагнера”, – заявил Канев. Журналист пообещал, что на днях опубликует детали участия Чепиги в спецоперации по эвакуации экс-президента Украины. Ранее пресс-секретарь Владимира Путина Дмитрий Песков опроверг сообщения о том, что Чепига получал звание героя. В то же время Сергей Канев покинул Россию после начала доследственной проверки ФСБ утечки личных данных “Боширова-Чепиги” и второго подозреваемого по делу Скрипалей – Александра Петрова, настоящее имя которого журналисты обещали раскрыть в ближайшее время. Канев опасается, что за его расследование его ждет уголовное преследование. Бывший сотрудник ГРУ России Сергей Скрипаль и его дочь были отравлены в марте 2018 года в британском городе Солсбери нервно-паралитическим агентом “Новичок”. Им удалось выжить после покушения. |
||||
Российский журналист заявил об участии Чепиги в эвакуации Януковича | ||||
Обвиняемый Скотланд-Ярдом в отравлении бывшего полковника ГРУ Минобороны РФ Сергея Скрипаля россиянин Руслан Боширов (которого ряд СМИ называет полковником российской военной разведки Анатолий Чепига) принимал участие в эвакуации с Украины бывшего главы государства Виктора Януковича.
Реклама Об этом рассказал в интервью украинским СМИ журналист «Центра управления расследованиями» Сергей Канев, покинувший Россию после публикации материалов по «делу Скрипалей». По данным полиции, Скрипаль и его дочь внезапно почувствовали себя плохо и потеряли сознание. Пострадавшие были госпитализированы под наблюдение экспертов Центра радиационного, химического и экологического мониторинга. Вскоре Германия, Франция, Канада и США опубликовали совместное заявление, согласившись с выводами правоохранителей Великобритании по делу Скрипалей. Союзники британцев солидарны с тем, что отравили экс-полковника и его дочь сотрудники ГРУ – Александр Петров и Руслан Боширов — , а атака проходила под эгидой Кремля и с одобрения властей РФ. |
||||
Russia Says Photos Don’t Prove Its Spy Was Linked to Skripal Case | World News | US News | ||||
Sept. 28, 2018, at 6:33 a.m.
Russia Says Photos Don’t Prove Its Spy Was Linked to Skripal Case FILE PHOTO: Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov looks on during a visit to the Mazda Sollers Manufacturing Rus joint venture plant of Sollers and Japanese Mazda in Vladivostok, Russia September 10, 2018. Valery Sharifulin/TASS Host Photo Agency/Pool via REUTERSReuters
By Andrey Ostroukh and Andrey Kuzmin
MOSCOW (Reuters) – The Kremlin said on Friday a likeness between a Russian intelligence colonel and a suspect in the Skripal poisoning case does not prove they are the same person, comparing the resemblance to that of impersonators posing as Lenin.
Former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found slumped on a public bench in the English city of Salisbury in March. Britain says they were poisoned with a nerve agent administered by Russian intelligence officers. A woman later died from what British police say was contact with the poison which her partner found in a discarded perfume bottle.
Russia denies any involvement in the affair, which has deepened its international isolation.
Moscow says two Russian men captured on surveillance footage near the scene of the poisoning were tourists visiting Salisbury twice during a weekend trip to Britain, an explanation London says is so far-fetched as to all but prove Russia’s involvement.
Investigative website Bellingcat this week published a picture of a decorated Russian military intelligence colonel it named as Anatoliy Chepiga who resembles one of the men spotted in the surveillance footage.
“We don’t know to what extent we can make any formal conclusions about who looks like whom, are they alike, where they lived, where they grew up,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on a conference call.
“On Red Square there are still 10 Stalins and 15 Lenins running around, and they look remarkably like the originals,” he said, referring to people who dress up as Soviet leaders to pose for photographs with tourists.
Peskov said in order to draw any conclusions, the Russian authorities needed verified information from British officials about the Skripal case, something he said London has been consistently withholding.
“We do not want to participate any more in the propagation of this issue as a partner of the media,” said Peskov.
(Reporting and writing by Andrey Kuzmin; Editing by Christian Lowe and Peter Graff)
Copyright 2018 Thomson Reuters.
|
||||
Tragedy? Farce? Confusion? The Method Behind That Russian Poisoning Interview – The New York Times | ||||
MOSCOW — The reviews were not kind when two Russians accused of slipping into England and poisoning a turncoat spy appeared on TV to profess their innocence. They were, the men said, just a couple of sports nutritionists taking a weekend jaunt to a cathedral town. “One of the biggest information warfare blunders ever,” declared a BBC diplomatic editor. Others said the interview on Russian state television was a skit worthy of Monty Python. The British government said it was “an insult to the public’s intelligence.” But foreigners rolling their eyes and dismissing the men’s account as patently implausible may be missing the point. For Russia, the yardstick of success for the interview was not credibility. “It is a slap in the face of the West,” said Peter Pomerantsev, a fellow at the London School of Economics and author of “Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible,” an account of his time as a television producer in Moscow. Russia, said Mr. Pomerantsev, “gave up a long time ago on trying to convince anybody that it is telling the truth.”
Advertisement
But the Kremlin works hard to confuse and distract, and to convince everyone, whether inside Russia or beyond, that President Vladimir V. Putin is so strong he can set his own truth, no matter how hard it may be to believe. From Moscow’s viewpoint, the interview on RT, a Kremlin-funded network formerly known as Russia Today, was a masterpiece of in-your-face defiance. It also reprised the greatest hits of Russian propaganda under Mr. Putin. In just 25 minutes, the interview distilled the favorite tropes of the Kremlin’s propaganda machine: Russia always gets blamed by the West for crimes it did not commit. Its people thirst for a Europe of churches and traditional culture, but are frustrated in their high-minded aspirations by obstacles thrown up abroad, in this case the English weather. There was even a cameo role for the Kremlin’s old standby, homophobia, with heavy hints that the two men accused by Britain, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, may well be gay and therefore could not possibly be Russian military intelligence officers deployed, as Britain says they were, for the manly business of assassination. Konstantin von Eggert, a political commentator and former talk show host on independent television, said the appearance of the two men on RT was not really meant to convince anybody of Russia’s innocence in the Salisbury attack but only to deliver a message to foreign critics and domestic foes that “nothing you say or do will change anything.”
Advertisement
The Kremlin, he said, “is telling the West: ‘Yes, we did it, yes, we messed up, and yes, we will do it again if we want.’” That Mr. Putin had a hand in orchestrating the interview was clear from the fact that, a day before it was broadcast by RT on Thursday, he declared Mr. Petrov and Mr. Boshirov innocent of any crimes and, speaking at an economic conference in Vladivostok, urged them to come forward to tell their story. They swiftly obliged. By the end of the same day, they had contacted Margarita Simonyan, the RT editor in chief, and sat down in front of the camera to answer a series of softball questions. These did not include the most obvious question: How did the hotel room where the men stayed in London come to have traces of Novichok, the nerve agent used against Sergei V. Skripal, a former Russian spy. Mr. Skripal survived the attack, and Mr. Putin’s role has set off speculation that he may have ordered military commanders to make Mr. Boshirov and Mr. Petrov appear on television to punish them for their bungling performance in Salisbury, England. Mr. Putin, however, has no history of publicly sanctioning, even less of humiliating, his so-called siloviki, the military and security service officials who dominate his administration, no matter how disastrously incompetent or corrupt they or their underlings might be. Instead of killing Mr. Skripal, the nerve agent attack landed him and his daughter, Yulia, in the hospital, along with a British police officer and a Salisbury resident — and left Moscow open to condemnation for an act of state terrorism with a military grade chemical weapon.
Advertisement
Then, on top of that, according to British investigators, the two men discarded a vial that carried the Novichok so carelessly that a British woman died after her boyfriend found it months later and, thinking it was perfume, brought the bottle home as a gift. In the RT interview, Mr. Petrov and Mr. Boshirov insisted that they had such a keen interest in medieval ecclesiastical architecture and burning desire to see Salisbury’s cathedral that they traveled to Britain for a weekend getaway that included two separate trips to Salisbury and two nights in a grungy London hotel. They firmly denied any connection to Russian military intelligence, now called the G.U. but until recently known as the G.R.U. Their account — which included claims of knee-deep slush and “transport collapse” that forced them to abandon a first visit to Salisbury on March 3 and try again on March 4, the day of the nerve agent attack — struck many Britons as so risible that a columnist in The Guardian suggested that “comedy is now diplomacy by other means.” There was some snow in Salisbury at the time but none of the weather-induced “havoc” cited by Mr. Petrov and nothing that might normally deter two fit Russian men accustomed to harsh winters from walking a few hundred yards from the railway station to the cathedral. And why, if they were so keen to see the cathedral, did they head in the opposition direction from the station and wander into Mr. Skripal’s neighborhood on the other side of town? “The whole situation is some kind of extraordinary coincidence — that’s all,” Mr. Petrov told RT, “What are we guilty of?” Their story certainly did not win over many people in Britain and elsewhere, or help burnish Russia’s image. The interview also left many Russians, even some sympathetic to the Kremlin, shaking their heads. It was so bizarre that a television critic, Arina Borodina, claimed that Ms. Simonyan, the RT editor, had not really met the two men and that footage of her asking them questions had been spliced together with their answers, delivered in a secret location under supervision.
Advertisement
Jakub Kalensky, who leads efforts to counter disinformation at a European Union strategic communication unit in Brussels, said the widely panned interview on RT suggested that Russia’s “message may simply be this: ‘We just don’t care how credible or incredible what we say sounds.’” But the two men did manage to build a high — if not very believable — wall of denial. And they also “succeeded in turning the tragedy in Salisbury into a farce,” said Mr. Pomerantsev, the former Russian television producer. Still, on Saturday, Russian claims that Mr. Petrov and Mr. Boshirov were innocent, fun-loving civilians took a blow when Novaya Gazeta, an opposition Russian newspaper, reported that the Moscow telephone number listed for Mr. Petrov in official records belonged to the Russian Defense Ministry. And an investigation by Bellingcat, an online platform, found that there is no record of either Mr. Boshirov or Mr. Petrov in an official database of residential and passport information before 2009, when they were issued internal passports under the names they now use. It said this suggested that the two men had previously used other names and that their current names are “cover identities for operatives of one of the Russian security services.” Mr. Petrov’s official file, Bellingcat said, is marked “top secret.” The overriding message from the RT interview, as with all of Russia’s responses to foreign accusations against the country, was that blameless Russians have again fallen victim to Western lies and prejudice. In a near-permanent state of high-dudgeon over Western accusations of misbehavior, Russia invariably responds to criticism by condemning the critic. Just this week, the Foreign Ministry summoned the Swiss and Dutch ambassadors to Moscow to complain that their countries were damaging relations after reports the Netherlands expelled two Russian spies accused of plotting cyber-sabotage of a Swiss defense laboratory analyzing the nerve agent used in Salisbury. In their interview, Mr. Petrov and Mr. Boshirov adopted the same plaintive tone used by Mr. Putin and his officials in response to past accusations. Among them: that Russian missiles shot down an airliner in July 2014 over eastern Ukraine; that Russian troops supported a bloody separatist rebellion there; and that Russian hackers meddled in the 2016 presidential election in the United States. “We just want to be left in peace,” Mr. Boshirov said, demanding that Britain apologize for all the grief it has caused him and Mr. Petrov.
Correction:
An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to the nerve agent Novichok. It is a chemical weapon, not a biological one.
Sophia Kishkovsky contributed reporting.
A version of this article appears in print on , on Page A6 of the New York edition with the headline: In Interview With Two Russians, Credibility Is the Half of It. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
|
||||
chepiga deripaska – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
chepiga deripaska – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
chepiga deripaska – Google Search | ||||
|
||||
chepiga deripaska – Google Search | ||||
|